European ASP.NET MVC 4 and MVC 5 Hosting

BLOG about ASP.NET MVC 3, ASP.NET MVC 4, and ASP.NET MVC 5 Hosting and Its Technology - Dedicated to European Windows Hosting Customer

European ASP.NET MVC 4 Hosting :: Preventing Cross Site Scripting Attacks in ASP.NET MVC 4

clock November 8, 2013 08:14 by author Scott

A website is exposed to various types of attacks and one of the most common types of attack is what is known as Cross Site Scripting (XSS). In a cross site scripting attack, malicious markup and script is entered in the web pages that are viewed by other users. If proper care is not taken to filter this malicious piece of markup, the script gets stored in the system and also rendered on web pages. Depending on the script injected by the hacker it can cause damage ranging from annoying popups to stolen credentials to accessing data stored in cookies. Therefore, it is important for ASP.NET MVC developers to prevent these types of attacks. Luckily, ASP.NET MVC offers a helping hand in safeguarding your websites. This article discusses some of the basics involved in the process.

What is Cross Site Scripting Attack?

In order to understand what a cross site scripting attack is, let's develop a simple ASP.NET MVC website that accepts some user input. Suppose that you are developing a blog engine and users are allowed to leave comments on blog posts. The following figure shows how the comments might be accepted:

As you might have guessed, the user can enter any text in the textbox and the textarea, including HTML markup tags and script fragments! Once the form is submitted the posted data is saved in the database as shown below:

public ActionResult SaveData(FormCollection form)

{
   
BlogEntities1 db = new BlogEntities1();
   
Comment comment = new Comment();
    comment
.UserName = form["username"];
    comment
.UserComment = form["usercomment"];
    comment
.PostedOn = DateTime.Now;
    db
.Comments.Add(comment);
    db
.SaveChanges();
   
return View("Index");
}

As shown above, the form is submitted to the SaveData() action method. The SaveData() method saves the data in a SQL Server database table named Comments. So far so good. Now assume that a use enters the following text in the comments textarea:

<h1>Hello   World!</h1>
<script>
alert('Cross   site scripting attack!');
</script>  

When such a user posts the above content it gets saved in the database. Later when this saved content is rendered on a web page it executes the script!

What the above example illustrates is a very mild version of a cross site scripting attack. Imagine what would happen if a clever hacker loads a malicious script from some different location and stole end user cookies or loaded undesirable content. That is why it is important for you to prevent cross site scripting attacks.

Note: 
By default ASP.NET 4.5 throws an exception if potentially dangerous content is detected in the request. However, you may need to deviate from this default mechanism in certain cases. In certain legitimate cases it is perfectly acceptable for the user to submit markup. For example, a web page where a blog owner enters the content of a blog post should accept HTML tags. In such cases you can skip the default checking performed by ASP.NET. You can either set requestValidationMode in web.config or use the [ValidateInput] attribute on action methods.

Preventing Cross Site Scripting Attacks

Most of the cross site scripting attacks can be prevented if you encode all the user input properly. You need to ensure that strings are encoded properly at two distinct places as far as ASP.NET MVC applications are concerned:

- Views
- Controllers or classes

In order to encode strings in views you can use the Html.Encode() method as shown below:

<%= Html.Encode(c.UserComment) %>

As you can see the view that displays the user comment now encodes the comment using the Html.Encode() method; this way all of the special characters such as <, > and & are encoded properly. For example, once Encode() method is in place the same malicious input by the end user is encoded and then rendered on the page as shown below:

As you can see the script is no longer executed even if the comment saved in the database contains the <script> tag. Instead the HTML markup is encoded and then displayed on the page.

There is also a shortcut to using the Html.Encode(), you can use <%: and %> block instead of <%= and %>. The following code shows how:

<%: c.UserComment %>

The <%: and %> block HTML encodes the string and then emits on the page.

The above code takes care of displaying content on the page by HTML encoding it. Here the encoding happens at the View level but the database still contains the malicious markup and script. Wouldn't it be nice if you HTML encode the content before saving it into the database? You can do so in your controllers or other classes using the Server.HtmlEncode() method.

comment.UserComment   = Server.HtmlEncode(form["usercomment"]);
...
db.SaveChanges();
...

As you can see the HtmlEncode() method of Server object accepts the raw string and returns an HTML encoded version of the same. The database now stores the HTML encoded version of the comments rather than the raw version. If you need to decode the HTML encoded version back you can use Server.HtmlDecode() method.

In addition to the HTML output displayed on a web page, you may also consider encoding attributes and URLs. Encoding attribute values is important if you are dynamically changing them based on user input. For example, you might be accepting a user's website URL and then setting the href attribute of an anchor tag dynamically. In such cases it is better to encode attribute values using the Html.AttributeEncode() method. On the same lines you can encode URL values using the  Url.Encode() method.

Using AntiXssEncoder to Encode Strings

The techniques to prevent cross site scripting attacks that we covered so far are traditional techniques that have roots in the core ASP.NET framework. In some cases where security is extremely important you may want to use an even more secure technique of encoding. Luckily, System.Web.Security.AntiXss namespace provides a class - AntiXssEncoder - that can be used to encode HTML content and attribute values. The major difference between the default encoder used by ASP.NET and the AntiXssEncoder class is that the former uses a blacklist of a set of prohibited characters whereas the later uses a whitelist of a set of allowed characters making it more secure.

The following code shows how AntiXssEncoder class can be used in a controller:

public   ActionResult SaveData(FormCollection form)
{
     BlogEntities1 db = new BlogEntities1();
     Comment comment = new Comment();
 comment.UserName   = AntiXssEncoder.HtmlEncode(form["username"], false);   comment.UserComment =   AntiXssEncoder.HtmlEncode(form["usercomment"], false);    comment.PostedOn =   DateTime.Now;
     db.Comments.Add(comment);
     db.SaveChanges();
     return View("Index");
}

As you can see, AntiXssEncoder class has static methods such as HtmlEncode() and HtmlAttributeEncode() that can be used to encode form data.

By default, methods such as Server.HtmlEncode() use the HttpEncoder class for performing the encoding. You can override this default with the AntiXssEncoder class by adding the following markup in the web.config file:

<httpRuntime encoderType="System.Web.Security.AntiXss.AntiXssEncoder" />

As shown above, the encoderType attribute of the <httpRuntime> tag is set to System.Web.Security.AntiXss.AntiXssEncoder so that the default encoder class is now set to AntiXssEncoder.



How to get textboxes values in MVC4 created by jQuery

clock October 30, 2013 11:22 by author Ronny

Yesterday, I was trying to get the values of TextBoxes created by jQuery. I was expecting to get the value of each Textbox created by jQuery by the Id attribute of the TextBox, but I was getting NULL. I tried to find out the reason behind this reason and finally I got the solution. Let's understand the ID and Name attribute of Html controls.
ID
Id attribute of an input html control is responsible for uniquely identified a control on the html page. We use Id for getting an input html control's value using jQuery at client side or for applying some CSS to that control.
Name
Name attribute of an input html control is responsible for posting that control values on server side.
Hence, while creating a Html TextBox or Dropdown list using jQuery also defined the Id and Name attributes of an Html TextBox or Dropdown list.
Note
When you will not defined the Name attributes of an Html TextBox or Dropdown list then form will not post the TextBox or Dropdown list values to the server. It means at controller's action result you will not find the Html TextBox or Dropdown list.
Suppose, you need to select no of customers from drop down list as shown below fig.

Also, Textboxes for entering customers full name are created by jQuery as shown below.

When you will submit the form you will get the Textboxes created by jQuery at controller side as shown below -

The View

<script src="~/Scripts/jquery-1.8.2.js"></script>
<script>
$(document).ready(function () {
$("#ddl").change(function () {
var i = $("#ddl :selected").val();
var str = "";
for (var j = 1; j <= i; j++) {
var id = "txtCustomer" + j;
//Remember to add name attribute to get values at server side
str = str + "<span>Customer " + j + " Full Name: </span><input type='text' id='" + id + "' name='" + id + "'/><br/>";
}
$("#content").html(str);
});
});
</script>
<br />
@using (Html.BeginForm())
{
<h2>Get TextBoxes Values Created by jQuery</h2>
<span>Select No. of Customers </span>
<select name="ddl">
<option>Select</option>
<option>1</option>
<option>2</option>
<option>3</option>
<option>4</option>
</select>
<br />
<div>
</div>
<br />
<div align="center">
<input id="btnSave" value="Save" />
</div>
}

You can get the Html TextBox or Dropdown list values created by jQuery by two method as given below -

Method 1: Get Values Using FormCollection

public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(FormCollection form, string ddl)
{
for (int i = 1; i <= Convert.ToInt32(ddl); i++)
{
string id = "txtCustomer" + i;
string customer = form[id];
}
return View();
}

Method 2: Get Values Using Request.Form

public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Index(string ddl)
{
for (int i = 1; i <= Convert.ToInt32(ddl); i++)
{
string id = "txtCustomer" + i;
string customer = Request.Form[id];
}
return View();
}

What do you think?
I hope you will enjoy the tips while programming with MVC. I would like to have feedback from my blog readers. Your valuable feedback, question, or comments about this article are always welcome.



European ASP.NET MVC 4 Hosting - Amsterdam :: ValidateInput and AllowHtml attribute in MVC4

clock October 28, 2013 09:43 by author Scott

Sometimes, your required to save Html data in the database. By default Asp.Net MVC doesn't allow a user to submit html for avoiding Cross Site Scripting attack to your application. Suppose you have below form and you can submit the Html in description textarea.

If you do this and try to submit it you will get the error below

However, if you want to do this, you can achieve it by using ValidateInput attribute and AllowHtml attribute.

ValidateInput Attribute

This is the simple way to allow the submission of HTML. This attribute can enable or disable input validation at the controller level or at any action method.

ValidateInput at Controller Level

[ValidateInput(false)]
public class HomeController : Controller
{
public ActionResult AddArticle()
{
return View();
}

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult AddArticle(BlogModel blog)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{

}
return View();
}
}

Now, the user can submit Html for this Controller successfully.

ValidateInput at Action Method Level

public class HomeController : Controller
{
public ActionResult AddArticle()
{
return View();
}

[ValidateInput(false)]
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult AddArticle(BlogModel blog)
{
if (ModelState.IsValid)
{

}
return View();
}
}

Now, the user can submit Html for this action method successfully.

Limitation of ValidateInput attribute

This attribute also has the issue since this allow the Html input for all the properties and that is unsafe. Since you have enable Html input for only one-two properties then how to do this. To allow Html input for a single property, you should useAllowHtml attribute.

AllowHtml Attribute

This is the best way to allow the submission of HTML for a particular property. This attribute will be added to the property of a model to bypass input validation for that property only. This explicit declaration is more secure than the ValidateInput attribute.

using System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations;
using System.Web.Mvc; 

public class BlogModel
{
[Required]
[Display(Name = "Title")]
public string Title { get; set; } 

[AllowHtml]
[Required]
[Display(Name = "Description")]
public string Description{ get; set; } 

}

Make sure, you have removed the ValidateInput attribute from Conroller or Action method. Now, the user can submit Html only for the Description property successfully.



European ASP.NET MVC Hosting - Amsterdam :: Example Routing in ASP.NET MVC

clock October 18, 2013 12:32 by author Scott

Basically, Routing is a pattern matching system that monitor the incoming request and figure out what to do with that request. At runtime, Routing engine use the Route table for matching the incoming request's URL pattern against the URL patterns defined in the Route table. You can register one or more URL patterns to the Route table at Application_Start event.

How to defining route...

    public static void RegisterRoutes(RouteCollection routes)
    {
    routes.MapRoute(
    "Default", // Route name
    "{controller}/{action}/{id}", // Route Pattern
    new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = UrlParameter.Optional } // Default values for above defined parameters
    );
    }    

    protected void Application_Start()
    {
    RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
    //To:DO
    }

When the routing engine finds a match in the route table for the incoming request's URL, it forwards the request to the appropriate controller and action. If there is no match in the route table for the incoming request's URL, it returns a 404 HTTP status code.

Note

Always remeber route name should be unique across the entire application. Route name cann't be duplicate.

How it works...

In above example we have defined the Route Pattern {controller}/{action}/{id} and also provide the default values for controller,action and id parameters. Default values means if you will not provide the values for controller or action or id defined in the pattern then these values will be serve by the routing system.

Suppose your webapplication is running on www.example.com then the url pattren for you application will be www.example.com/{controller}/{action}/{id}. Hence you need to provide the controller name followed by action name and id if it is required. If you will not provide any of the value then default values of these parameters will be provided by the routing system.

Difference between Routing and URL Rewriting

Many developers compares routing to URL rewritting that is wrong. Since both the approaches are very much different. Moreover, both the approaches can be used to make SEO friendly URLs. Below is the main difference between these two approaches.

  • URL rewriting is focused on mapping one URL (new url) to another URL (old url) while routing is focused on mapping a URL to a resource.
  • Actually, URL rewriting rewrites your old url to new one while routing never rewrite your old url to new one but it map to the original route.


Press Release - Premier European HostForLIFE.eu Proudly Announces FREE Trial Windows ASP.NET Hosting

clock October 8, 2013 12:33 by author Scott

European Windows and ASP.NET hosting specialist, HostForLIFE.eu, has officially launched FREE trial web hosting package. This free trial is offered for the next 14 days and at anytime, the customers can always cancel anytime. This FREE trial packages combine generous or unlimited web space, unlimited bandwith, unlimited email accounts, 1 MSSQL database, 1 MySQL database. There is also the ability to host multiple websites in this package. As the market for hosted solutions continues to grow, the new hosting range is designed to exceed the growing technical demands of businesses and IT professionals.

HostForLIFE.eu continues to invest heavily in developing powerful and resilient Business web hosting packages. The new range scales to accommodate a wide range of business needs including ecommerce and multiple websites. The range comprises of Classic Package, which is priced €3.00/month. The Budget Package is priced at €5.50/month. There is Economy package which is priced €8.00/month, this is the most favourite package and it is designed for Portal/Business site. And then Business Package is priced at €11.00/month. Furthermore, the Business Package delivers HostForLIFE’s most powerful shared hosting feature set to date, and is optimized for hosting multiple and business websites.

Every day thousands of people decide to set up a website for business or personal use. New business owners and the average consumer don't always have access to unlimited budgets. HostForLIFE.eu understand the importance of reliable hosting but are not always prepared to pay the exorbitant prices that reliable hosts charge.

“We believe that all customers should be given a free trial before buying into a service and with such approach, customers are confident that the product / service that they choose is not faulty or wrong.” Said John Curtis, VP Marketing and Business Development at HostForLIFE.eu. “With this free trial hosting, we want our customers to test drive our quality services. We believe that our web hosting platform and customer support are up there with the best and our commitment to give the best for our customers.”

HostForLIFE.eu is awarded Top No#1 SPOTLIGHT Recommended Hosting Partner by Microsoft (see www.microsoft.com/web/hosting/HostingProvider/Details/953). HostForLIFE.eu services is ranked the highest top #1 spot in several European countries, such as: Germany, Italy, Netherlands, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland and other European countries. Besides this award, HostForLIFE.eu has also won several awards from reputable organizations in the hosting industry and the detail can be found on HostForLIFE.eu official website.

For more information about this FREE trial package offered by HostForLIFE.eu, please visit http://www.hostforlife.eu

About HostForLIFE.eu:

HostForLIFE.eu is European Windows Hosting Provider which focuses on Windows Platform only. HostForLIFE.eu deliver on-demand hosting solutions including Shared hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Dedicated Servers, and IT as a Service for companies of all sizes.

HostForLIFE.eu number one goal is constant uptime. HostForLIFE.eu data center uses cutting edge technology, processes, and equipment. HostForLIFE.eu has one of the best up time reputations in the industry.

HostForLIFE.eu second goal is providing excellent customer service. HostForLIFE.eu technical management structure is headed by professionals who have been in the industry since it's inception. HostForLIFE.eu has customers from around the globe, spread across every continent. HostForLIFE.eu serves the hosting needs of the business and professional, government and nonprofit, entertainment and personal use market segments.   



European ASP.NET MVC 4 Hosting - Amsterdam :: How To Build async Unit of Work with MVC 4

clock October 8, 2013 12:06 by author Ronny

In the RavenDB mailing list, How to combine the standard unit of work pattern of working with RavenDB in MVC applications with async. In particular, the problematic code was:

public class HomeController : Controller
   {
        public IAsyncDocumentSession Db { get; set; }
        public async Task<ActionResult> Index()
       {
            var person = new Person {Name = "Khalid Abuhakmeh"};
            await Db.StoreAsync(person);     

          return View(person);
       }
           protected override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext)
       {
           Db = MvcApplication.DocumentStore.OpenAsyncSession();
           base.OnActionExecuting(filterContext);
       }

       protected override void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext filterContext)
       {
           Db.SaveChangesAsync()
               .ContinueWith(x => { });
           base.OnActionExecuted(filterContext);
       }
    lic class Person
       {
           public string Id { get; set; }
           public string Name { get; set; }
       }
   }

As you probably noticed, the problem Db.SaveChangesAsync(). We want to execute the save changes in an async manner, but we don’t want to do that in a way that would block the thread. The current code just assume the happy path, and any error would be ignored. That ain’t right. If we were using Web API, this would be trivially easy, but we aren’t. So let us see what can be done about it.

I created a new MVC 4 application and wrote the following code:

As you can see, I have a break point after the await, which means that when that break point is hit, I’ll be able to see what is responsible for handling async calls in MVC4. When the breakpoint was hit, I looked at the call stack, and saw:

 

Not very useful, right? But we can fix that:

And now we get:

This is a whole bunch of stuff that doesn’t really help, I am afraid. But then I thought about putting the breakpoint before the await, which gave me:

And this means that I can check the code here. I got the code and started digging. At first I thought that I couldn’t do it, but then I discovered that I could. See, all you have to do is to create you own async action invoker, like so:

 public class UnitOfWorkAsyncActionInvoker : AsyncControllerActionInvoker
   
{
  
     protected override IAsyncResult BeginInvokeActionMethod(
  
         ControllerContext controllerContext,
  
         ActionDescriptor actionDescriptor,
  
         IDictionary<string, object> parameters, AsyncCallback callback,
  
         object state)
  
    {
  
         return base.BeginInvokeActionMethod(controllerContext, actionDescriptor, parameters,
 
                                             result => DoSomethingAsyncAfterTask().ContinueWith(task => callback(task)),
 
                                             state);
 
     }
 
     public async Task DoSomethingAsyncAfterTask()
 
     {
 
         await Task.Delay(1000);
 
     }
  
}
And then register it :

   DependencyResolver.SetResolver(type =>
 
     {
 
         if (type == typeof (IAsyncActionInvoker))
 
             return new UnitOfWorkAsyncActionInvoker();
 
         return null;
 
     }, type => Enumerable.Empty<object>());

Note: Except for doing a minimum of F5 in the debugger, I have neither tested nor verified this code. It appears to do what I want it to, and since I am only getting to this because a customer asked about this in the mailing list, that is about as much investigation time that I can dedicate to it.

 



European ASP.NET MVC 3 Hosting - Amsterdam :: It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.

clock September 18, 2013 09:14 by author Scott

I write this blog post as I saw many people get this error message when deployed their MVC 3 application:

Error 1 It is an error to use a section registered as allowDefinition='MachineToApplication' beyond application level. This error can be caused by a virtual directory not being configured as an application in IIS.

You can find the resource error on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5161511/mvc3-strange-error-after-switching-on-compilation-of-views or forums.asp.net.

Its always a good idea to compile your Razor views. The reason being that errors within a view file are not detected until run time.

To let you detect these errors at compile time, ASP.NET MVC projects now include an MvcBuildViews property, which is disabled by default. To enable this property, open the project file and set the MvcBuildViews property to true, as shown in the following example:

After enabling MvcBuildViews you may find that error above.

Turns out that this problem occurs when there is web project output (templated web.config or temporary publish files) in the obj folder. The ASP.NET compiler used isn't smart enough to ignore stuff in the obj folder, so it throws errors instead.

The fix was a modification to the MVC Project File as shown below:

Under the <Target Name="MvcBuildViews" AfterTargets="AfterBuild" Condition="'$(MvcBuildViews)'=='true'"> node, add the following :

<ItemGroup>


  <ExtraWebConfigs Include="$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)\**\web.config" />

  <ExtraPackageTmp Include="$([System.IO.Directory]::GetDirectories(&quot;$(BaseIntermediateOutputPath)&quot;, &quot;PackageTmp&quot;, System.IO.SearchOption.AllDirectories))" />

</ItemGroup>
<Delete Files="@(ExtraWebConfigs)" />
<RemoveDir Directories="@(ExtraPackageTmp)" />

Hope this helps!



European ASP.NET MVC 4 Hosting - Amsterdam :: Securely Verify and Validate Image Uploads in ASP.NET and ASP.NET MVC

clock September 17, 2013 10:01 by author Ronny

One of the more interesting things had to do as part of building XAPFest was handle bulk image uploads for screenshots for applications and user / app icons. Most of the challenges here are UI-centric ones (which resolved using jQuery File-Upload) but the one security challenge that remains outstanding is ensuring that the content uploaded to your servers is safe for your users to consume.

Fortunately this problem isn't too hard to solve and doesn't require much code in C#.

Flawed Approaches to Verifying Image Uploads

Here's what usually see when developers try to allow only web-friendly image uploads:

  1. File extension validation (i.e. only allow images with .png, .jp[e]g, and .gif to be uploaded) and
  2. MIME type validation.


So what's wrong with these techniques? The issue is that both the file extension and MIME type can be spoofed, so there's no guarantee that a determined hacker might not take a js. file, slap an extra .png extension somewhere in the mix and spoof the MIME type.

Stronger Approach to Verifying Image Uploads: GDI+ Format Checking

Every file format has to follow a particular codec / byte order convention in order to be read and executed by software. This is as true for proprietary formats like .pptx as it is for .png and .gif.

You can use these codecs to your advantage and quickly tell if a file is really what it says it is - you quickly check the contents of the file against the supported formats codecs to see if the content fits into any of those specifications.

Luckily GDI+ (System.Drawing.Imaging), the graphics engine which powers Windows, has some super-simple functions we can use to perform this validation. Here's a bit of source you can use to validate a file against PNG, JPEG, and GIF formats:

using System.Drawing.Imaging;
using System.IO;
using System.Drawing;
namespace XAPFest.Providers.Security
{
    ///
    /// Utility class used to validate the contents of uploaded files  
    ///
    public static class FileUploadValidator  
    {    
     public static bool FileIsWebFriendlyImage(Stream stream)   
     {
            try
            {
                //Read an image from the stream...
                var i = Image.FromStream(stream);
                 //Move the pointer back to the beginning of the stream
                stream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
                 if (ImageFormat.Jpeg.Equals(i.RawFormat))
                    return true;
                return ImageFormat.Png.Equals(i.RawFormat)|| ImageFormat.Gif.Equals(i.RawFormat);
            }
            catch
            {
                return false;
            }
        }
     }
}

All this code does is read the Stream object returned for each posted file into an Image object, and then verifies that the Image supports one of three supported codecs. This source code has not been tested by security experts, so use it at your own risk. If you have any questions about how this code works or want to learn more, please drop me a line in the comments below or on Twitter.

How Do Make Sure Files Are below [X] Filesize

Since had this source code lying around anyway, We thought we would share it: 

Super-simple, like we said, but it gets the job done. Express the maximum allowable size as a long and compare it against the length of the stream

public static bool FileIsWebFriendlyImage(Stream stream, long size)
        {
            return stream.Length <= size && FileIsWebFriendlyImage(stream);
        }
    }
The other important catch to note here is that move the Stream's pointer back to the front of the stream, so it can be read again by the caller which passed the reference to this function.



European ASP.NET MVC 4 Hosting - Amsterdam :: Asynchronous Controllers in ASP.NET MVC 4

clock September 6, 2013 12:01 by author Scott

One of the most important features of ASP.NET MVC 4 is the introduction of the new ASP.NET Web API, which simplifies REST programming with a strongly typed HTTP object model. In addition, ASP.NET MVC 4 takes advantage of the new asynchronous programming model introduced with .NET Framework 4.5 to allow developers to write asynchronous action methods. It is important to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the new asynchronous methods to use them whenever they will provide a benefit.

(ASP.NET MVC 4 also includes many enhancements focused on mobile development, such as jQuery Mobile support and selecting views based on which mobile browser makes requests. If you work with previous ASP.NET MVC versions and you target multiple mobile devices, the new display modes are worth moving to ASP.NET MVC 4. In addition, the bundling and minification framework makes it simpler to reduce HTTP requests for each page without having to use third-party tools.)

Asynchronous controllers ASP.NET MVC 4

Asynchronous execution is the future of Windows development : it has been largely demonstrated during the //Build conference two weeks ago.

In previous versions of ASP.NET MVC it was possible to create asynchronous controllers by inheriting the AsyncController class and using some conventions :

- MyActionAsync : method that returns void and launches an asynchronous process
- MyActionCompleted : method that returns an ActionResult (the result of the MVC action “MyAction”, in this case)

To allow the MVC engine to manage asynchronous operations and pass the result to the view engine, developers had to use the propery AsyncManager of the AsyncController. The “completed” method parameters was passed by the MVC engine through this object.

For example, the controller that is defined bellow allows to get a Json-serialized list of movies – asynchronously – from an OData service :

public class MoviesController : AsyncController
{
    public ActionResult Index()
    {
        return View();
    } 

    public void GetJsonMoviesAsync(int? page)
    {
        const int pageSize = 20;
        int skip = pageSize * ((page ?? 1) - 1);
        string url = string.Format("http://odata.netflix.com/[…]&$skip={0}&$top={1}",
            skip, pageSize); 

        //the asynchronous operation is declared
        AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Increment(); 

        var webClient = new WebClient();
        webClient.DownloadStringCompleted += OnWebClientDownloadStringCompleted;
        webClient.DownloadStringAsync(new Uri(url));//the asynchronous process is launched
    } 

    private void OnWebClientDownloadStringCompleted(object sender,
        DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
    {
        //the asynchronous process ends
        //"movies" result is added to the parameters of the AsyncManager
        //NB : it's the name of the parameter that is take by the
        //GetJsonMoviesCompleted method
        List<Movie> movies = null;
        if (AsyncManager.Parameters.ContainsKey("movies"))
        {
            movies = (List<Movie>)AsyncManager.Parameters["movies"];
            movies.Clear();
        }
        else
        {
            movies = new List<Movie>();
            AsyncManager.Parameters["movies"] = movies;
        } 

        movies.AddRange(Movie.FromXml(e.Result)); 

        //the ends of the asynchronous operation (launches the call of "Action"Completed)
        AsyncManager.OutstandingOperations.Decrement();
    } 

    public ActionResult GetJsonMoviesCompleted(List<Movie> movies)
    {
        //on retourne le résultat Json
        return Json(movies, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
    }
}

It’s not really complicated to create an asynchronous controller but ASP.NET MVC 4 and C# 5 with the new async and await keywords will make it easier !

public class MoviesController : AsyncController
{
    public ActionResult Index()
    {
        return View();
    } 

    public async Task<ActionResult> GetJsonMovies(int? page)
    {
        const int pageSize = 20;
        int skip = pageSize * ((page ?? 1) - 1);
        string.Format("http://odata.netflix.com/[…]&$skip={0}&$top={1}",
                    skip, pageSize); 

        var webClient = new WebClient();
        string xmlResult = await webClient.DownloadStringTaskAsync(url);
        return Json(Movie.FromXml(xmlResult), JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
    }
}

As you can see in the previous code snippet, in ASP.NET MVC 4 you always should inherits from AsyncController but there is no more naming conventions, no more Async/Completed methods, no more AsyncManager and the action returns a Task instead of an ActionResult !

 



Press Release :: European HostForLIFE.eu Proudly Launches ASP.NET MVC 5 Hosting

clock August 28, 2013 11:05 by author Ronny

European Windows and ASP.NET hosting specialist, HostForLIFE.eu, has announced the availability of new hosting plans that are optimized for the latest update of the Microsoft ASP.NET Model View Controller (MVC) technology. The MVC web application framework facilitates the development of dynamic, data-driven websites.

The latest update to Microsoft’s popular MVC (Model-View-Controller) technology,  ASP.NET MVC 5 adds sophisticated features like single page applications, mobile optimization, adaptive rendering, and more. Here are some new features of ASP.NET MVC 5:

- ASP.NET Identity
- Bootstrap in the MVC template
- Authentication Filters
- Filter overrides

HostForLIFE.eu is Microsoft’s number one Recommended Windows and ASP.NET Spotlight Hosting Partner in Europe for its support of Microsoft technologies that include WebMatrix, WebDeploy, Visual Studio 2012, ASP.NET 4.5, ASP.NET MVC 4.0, Silverlight 5, and Visual Studio Lightswitch.

HostForLIFE.eu hosts its servers in top class data centers that is located in Amsterdam to guarantee 99.9% network uptime. All data center feature redundancies in network connectivity, power, HVAC, security, and fire suppression.

In addition to shared web hosting, shared cloud hosting, and cloud server hosting, HostForLIFE.eu offers reseller hosting packages and specialized hosting for Microsoft SharePoint 2010 and 2013. All hosting plans from HostForLIFE.eu include 24×7 support and 30 days money back guarantee.

For more information about this new product, please visit http://www.HostForLIFE.eu

About HostForLIFE.eu:

HostForLIFE.eu is Microsoft No #1 Recommended Windows and ASP.NET Hosting in European Continent. HostForLIFE.eu service is ranked the highest top #1 spot in several European countries, such as: Germany, Italy, Netherlands, France, Belgium, United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland, Switzerland and many top European countries.

HostForLIFE.eu number one goal is constant uptime. HostForLIFE.eu data center uses cutting edge technology, processes, and equipment. HostForLIFE.eu has one of the best up time reputations in the industry.

HostForLIFE.eu second goal is providing excellent customer service. HostForLIFE.eu technical management structure is headed by professionals who have been in the industry since it's inception. HostForLIFE.eu has customers from around the globe, spread across every continent. HostForLIFE.eu serve the hosting needs of the business and professional, government and nonprofit, entertainment and personal use market segments.



About HostForLIFE.eu

HostForLIFE.eu is European Windows Hosting Provider which focuses on Windows Platform only. We deliver on-demand hosting solutions including Shared hosting, Reseller Hosting, Cloud Hosting, Dedicated Servers, and IT as a Service for companies of all sizes.

We have offered the latest Windows 2016 Hosting, ASP.NET Core 2.2.1 Hosting, ASP.NET MVC 6 Hosting and SQL 2017 Hosting.


Tag cloud

Sign in